JUSTICE

JUSTICE

To all the viewers......

Dear Viewers,

The objective of Our Human Rights is to motivate people to take positive and peaceful action in support of human rights. Programs highlight how human rights abuses impact us all, and how we can do something about it.

We believe that supporting human rights is patriotic and thus everyone should take part and share the views and values. We believe that every person can make a difference. We believe that you can make a difference too.

The only way that human rights can be effectively protected is by respecting the principle that every individual possesses certain inherent fundamental rights that cannot be taken away – not even in the name of “the common good”, states of emergency, national security, or religious or other ideals. Otherwise none of us is really safe. We cannot defend principles and ideals by actions which undermine them.

Our intention must be genuine, acceptable and rational.

So all the comments must be based on Justice and Human Rights.

I would welcome any comments, any postings or and ideas regarding whatever happening through out the world as long it touches the topic of Justice & Human Rights.

Any comments please send to my email id at stands4justice@gmail.com


Thursday, November 29, 2007

Suhakam Should Investigate Torture Chambers & Torture Perpetrators

Memorandum of GERAKAN MANSUHKAN ISA (GMI)
To National Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM)
28th November 2007
On 18th October 2007, High Court judge Datuk Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus in a landmark judgment ruled that Abdul Malek Hussin’s ISA arrest and detention for 57 days in 1998 were unlawful and further found that he was tortured while under police custody and awarded him RM2.5 million in damages. The judge in awarding exemplary damages to the plaintiff said that it was to show the court’s abhorrence against the gross abuse of power by the police and the use of the ISA.
Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA (GMI) believes that this case is significant as not only was this the first time that the court had awarded significant compensation to an ISA detainee for unlawful detention and abuse, the case also highlighted the serious abuses and torture that happened while under detention.
GMI wishes to highlight that in a shameful indictment against the police and the then Inspector General of Police Abdul Rahim Noor (and the government), the judge found that Malek Hussin had suffered and endured the following events while under police custody:
- arrest and detention were made in bad faith;
- denied access to his lawyer;
- nature of interrogation was clearly for a political purpose and had nothing to do with genuine concern for national security;
- stripped naked in an air-conditioned room and interrogated;
- blindfolded during interrogation;
- physically assaulted up to 60 times;
- beaten until he was unconscious;
- forced to drink urine and rancid water;
- subjected to sexual abuse;
- threatened with harm against his wife and family;
- threatened not to take legal action or to report on his ordeal.
In the hard-hitting judgment (copy is enclosed), the judge made a few important findings that GMI believes SUHAKAM should be concerned with:
(1) the existence of “torture chambers” and the need for SUHAKAM to investigate further;
(2) the torture acts committed by the police personnel that still go unpunished.

Besides these, it is also pertinent to note that Malek Hussin in his civil suit had managed to identify positively the police officers that interrogated, tortured, assaulted and humilated him. GMI is informed that other detainees have also identified the same in the past.
In view of the above, GMI calls on SUHAKAM to take this opportunity:

1. to utilize its powers to initiate investigations into the “torture chambers” including the conditions and policies that allow such torture to take place

2. to initiate investigations againsts the police personnel that perpetrated these torture acts

3. to urge the Government to release all ISA detainees or charge them in an open court due to the gross abuse of power under the ISA as evident in the judgment of Malek Hussin’s case

4. to urge the Government to heed SUHAKAM’s recommendations to abolish ISA
GMI is of the view that this judgment is a wake-up call for SUHAKAM to intensify its efforts to abolish the ISA as clearly it has no place in a modern, civil and democratic society. The ISA - the most obnoxious, shameful and draconian law in Malaysian history - creates a climate for torture and ill-treatment and must be abolished.

While this case is certainly a welcome victory for justice and human rights, GMI would like to remind SUHAKAM that currently there are still about 90 persons being detained under the ISA, of which at least 26 will reach detention period of six years in 2008.

Lastly, GMI also wishes to highlight to SUHAKAM that the worldwide concern for injustice and human rights abuses perpetrated under the ISA has recently been adopted by the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC), an independent campaign and advocacy organization based in London (campaign pack is enclosed).
Release all ISA detainees!Abolish ISA!
Close Down Kemta!

Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh
Chairperson
Would like to have suggetions and comments on the above matter.
Feel free to email me at stands4justice@gmail.com so that we may know how many viewers agree with the above statements.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Renouncing citizenship: Chinese top the list

Chinese Malaysians record the highest number of those who have renounced their citizenship, followed by the Malays and Indians, the Dewan Rakyat wastold today.

The Home Ministry's parliamentary secretary, Abdul Rahman Ibrahim, said14,316 Chinese (87%) have surrendered their citizenship, compared to 1,098Malays (6.6%), 822 Indians (5%) and 238 (1.4%) others from 2000 to 2006.

He also explained that 106,000 people have renounced citizenship sinceIndependence in 1957.
Abdul Rahman said these Malaysians had applied for citizenship to India, SriLanka, Singapore, Japan, Canada and Indonesia.

"(Others) have applied to the UK and US, Taiwan, Thailand, Germany, NewZealand, France, Austria, Ireland, Sweden, Belgium, Brunei, Finland andJordan," he said.

*Living condition*

As to why so many Malaysians have opted to leave for other countries, he replied: "The main reason is the (quality of life) in those countries."

"They also consider the working environment, such as better opportunities and better pay. And some consider education for their children as a reason to apply for a citizenship in a particular country," he said.

Abdul Rahman was replying Mohamed Aziz (BN-Sri Gading) who asked for a breakdown of the figures according to race and the country of destination.

On a related matter, Abdul Rahman said the government takes into consideration three things before stripping a person of citizenship.

"Firstly, we see if the person holds citizenship in another country.Secondly, we see if the person has voted in that country's elections. And lastly, we (check) if the person holds a foreign passport," he said.

He explained that revoking citizenship can be implemented under Article24(2) and 3(a) of the Federal Constitution.

Giant hypermarket, hyperRacist? Police misuse of powers.





What was the fuss all about @ The Giant store, Seksyen 13, Shah Alam last weekend?


The following is the excerp of the police report made by one Sashindran a/l Ravichandran,22 who was beaten and insulted by 2 security guards of theGiant store.


Pada hari 16 hb November 2007, lebih kurang pukul 11.20 pagi, saya telah pergi ke “Giant” di Seksyen 13, Shah Alam untuk membeli barang. Setelah saya beli barang itu berjumlah RM23 dan selepas membayarnya saya meletakkan diatas kaunter “ Giant “ untuk beli satu lagi barang.
[…] Semasa saya bercakap dan meletakkan telefon saya dalam “ sling beg “ saya ditegur oleh 2 pegawai sekuriti “Giant “ dan dibawa ke bilik mereka.


Sejurus sahaja saya sampai dibilik itu, saya dipukul dari belakang dengan tangan oleh salah seorang pegawai sekuriti

The problem started when the unindentified security guards insulted the HINDU religion who the man profess.


Pegawai itu terus memukul saya dan paksa saya untuk duduk dibawah dan seterusnya memadamkan “kum kum “ yang merupakan kesucian agama saya serta mencabut rantai keagamaaan saya daripada saya dan lalu dicampak dalam bilik tersebut.


Selepas itu, pegawai sekuriti itu ambil gambar tuhan Krishna saya yang berada dalam bentuk “pendant “ dan meletakkan semula di atas dahi saya dan beritahu perkara berikut sebelum dia menendang saya dibahagian belakang :-“ Sekarang kamu nampak macam syaitan


He was later made to take pictures holding some items that was planted in his bag. The guards called police who later continued the abuse in the police station.


Semasa berada dalam kereta peronda, salah seorang polis memaki saya seperti berikut : -


1. “ India keling you apa 08 punya orangkah “

2. “ Saya boleh lepaskan awak dan tembak dan membuang saya dimana-mana sahaja.


Kemudian dia mengambil ID pekerja saya dari dompet saya dan campakkan keluar dari kereta. Masa itu, saya meminta jangan campak tetapi dia terus memaki saya seperti berikut :-


“ You India keling pasti masuk lokap, kamu akan hilang kerja, tak payah ada ID, Ini negara Islam, apasal you ada sini, kalau mau curi balik India “


I wasn’t surprised to read the police report, I wasn’t surprised to read the said insults. This is the country that I have been living the past 20years, and this is the kind of insults/abuse that is very common for minorities like us. Malaysia truly As(s)ia. But I am surprised that no one cared.


Calls have been made for Giant Store to sack and take action against the two security guards. You can pressure them too. Boycott Giant.
GCH Retail (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.Lot 2, Persiaran Sukan, Seksyen 13, 40100 Shah Alam.
Tel: 03 - 5544 8888 (Head Office)03 - 56358056 (Training and Development)
Fax: 03 - 5511 9663 (Human Resource)
03 - 56325255 (Training and Development)03 - 5544 8646 (Marketing)

Monday, November 19, 2007

Plantation families to lose homes

KUALA LUMPUR: Just give us a home we can call our own and the respect we deserve for our dedication to the country.

So say the plantation community of Ladang Bukit Jalil after being slapped with eviction notices by Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL).They have to be out by Thursday and the demolition of their homes is set for Friday. The 58 families were labelled as squatters after a census in the area in April last year, despite being employed by developers with contracts with DBKL to work the land since 1980. Ladang Bukit Jalil residents action committee secretary Thiakarajan Sathasivam, 54, said their pleas for an extension and a fair resettlement deal have fallen on deaf ears.

"We have sent so many appeal letters but never received a reply. Five days ago, we delivered a letter to the prime minister. Hopefully, he will postpone our eviction. "We are also hoping discussions with DBKL will materialise this week," he said.The community has been offered accommodation in the nearby Project Perumahan Rakyat, but according to Thiakarajan the agreement drafted by DBKL only offers a three-year tenancy without the option to purchase the homes when the term was up.If the head of the household dies, the agreement ends, leaving the rest of the family homeless.Housing is not the only problem this small community has to contend with.

The new Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan (T) Ladang Bukit Jalil may be boxed in by cemeteries, a crematorium and a detention centre."The cemetery land will be segmented according to the different religions, 13.97ha in total, while our 103-year-old temple and new school have been allotted 0.4ha to share.

"How are the children going to study, sandwiched between a crematorium and graveyards?

"We need at least 5ha for the school, so we have a proper field. Who is more important, the living or the dead?" asked the school's parent-teacher association chairman, S. Balakrishnan, 46, who fears the projects may already be confirmed as construction on the detention centre has begun.

The pupils and their parents were out in full force yesterday, calling for a new location and a resized plot to be gazetted for the school.

Works Minister Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu announced the school's relocation on Oct 16, saying the 61-year-old school was in a state of dilapidation, especially after being repeatedly hit by floods.

Year Six pupil found hanged

NIBONG TEBAL: A family’s bid to rescue a 12-year-old girl found hanged at their home in Changkat, near here proved to be futile.

They cut the blanket that gripped her neck and rushed the Year Six pupil to the nearest hospital in Sungai Bakap soon after the 1.40pm incident on Saturday.

However, the doctors there decided that S. Subashini be transferred to the Seberang Jaya Hospital, where she died at 4.05am yesterday.

Her grieving father, G. Sivakumar, 36, said his daughter was still alive when family members rushed her from their Penang Water Supply Corporation quarters to the Sungai Bakap Hospital.

He was away at work at the time of the incident.
The father of five daughters, aged three to 13, said Subashini had called for her mother when he visited her at the hospital.

He alleged that when she was transferred to the Seberang Jaya Hospital, the doctors there admitted her to the general ward despite her condition. He claimed that they had neglected to ward her in the intensive care unit.

Recapping the events that led to her death, Sivakumar said his daughter, who studied at a Tamil primary school, had been disappointed that she had not obtained the expected results in the UPSR examination.

“She had been crying since obtaining her results on Thursday,” sobbed Sivakumar, who said his daughter was a hardworking and bright pupil.

“I do not know what went wrong,” he added, saying that while she was confident of scoring at least 4As in the examination, the results showed that Subashini had only obtained 4Bs, 2Cs and 1D.

At about 1pm on Saturday, while the girl and other members of the family were chatting in the living room, Subashini got up and went upstairs, carrying a chair.

After about 40 minutes, when she did not return to join the family, one of her sisters went upstairs and found the girl with a blanket tied around her neck.

The young girl was buried at the Nibong Tebal Hindu cemetery here at 3pm yesterday.
South Seberang Prai OCPD Supt Shafien Mamat, when contacted, confirmed the incident and said police were investigating the case.

A hospital spokesman, when contacted, said Subashini was admitted to the high dependency ward and she was critically injured when she was brought in.

“The doctors did their best to save her but unfortunately she died,” she added.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

POLICE & YOUR BASIC RIGHTS

POLICE & YOUR BASIC RIGHTS

Every Malaysian Citizen's need to know the basic rights.


1. POLICE STOP YOU

1.1 Not in uniform, ask for identification

Say: “Please, show me your Police authority card”.

1.2 Police authority card

Red colour: Suspended Police Officer. He has no authority to do anything to you. Walk away.

Other colours:
· Blue colour: Rank of inspector and above
· Yellow colour: Below the rank of inspector
· White colour: Police reserve

Note his name and ID number

1.3 In uniform

Note his name and ID number on his uniform.

1.4 Police vehicle

Note the number plate of the patrol car or motorcycle.

2. POLICE QUESTION YOU WHEN STOPPED

2.1 Your identification

Only give your name, ID card number and address.

2.2 The Police ask other questions

Politely ask “Am I under arrest?”

2.3 When are you under arrest

You are arrested if the Police:

· tell you “yes”;
· do not allow you to leave/want to take you to the Police station; or
· handcuff you.

If you are not under arrest, you may walk away/refuse to follow him back to the Police station or anywhere else, if asked.

2.4 When you cannot be arrested

The Police cannot arrest you just because you are a potential witness and want to take a statement from you (112/Witness Statement).


3. QUESTIONING BY POLICE WITHOUT ARREST

3.1 112/Witness Statement

When the Police are investigating a case and think you have information/knowledge about the case, the Police may examine you and take down your answers (112/Witness Statement).

3.2 Informal/ Formal Request

Most times, the Police make an informal request that you give a 112/Witness Statement. If the place and time is convenient to you, cooperate. If not, tell the Police you will do so at a convenient place and time.

If you completely refuse to cooperate, the Police can issue a formal order in writing signed by an investigating officer (Police Order) to ask you to cooperate.

If you disobey a Police Order, you cannot be arrested. However, it is an offence and the Police may request the Magistrate to issue a warrant against you to compel you to cooperate.

3.3 Giving a 112/ Witness Statement

You have the right to ask a lawyer to accompany you. This is advisable.

In giving a 112/ Witness Statement, you may refuse to answer any question / remain silent if the answer is likely to expose you to a criminal offence.

· Bring along a notebook or writing paper with you (Personal Notes).
· Write down every question asked in your Personal Notes.
· Make sure you understand every question asked.
· Take your time and think carefully before writing your answers in your Personal Notes.
· Read your answers to the Police Officer questioning you.
· Keep your Personal Notes for future reference.

3.4 Signing your 112/Witness Statement

Before signing your statement, read the questions and your answers written by the Police Officer carefully.

· Compare the statement you are asked to sign with your Personal Notes.
· You have the right to make any corrections/changes to the statement before signing.
· Sign your signature immediately below the last sentence of your statement.

4. POLICE ARREST YOU

4.1 Ask: “Why am I under arrest?”

An arrest is unlawful if you are not informed of the reason.

4.2 Do not resist an arrest

The Police have the right to use reasonable force to arrest you if you resist.

4.3 Ask: “Which Police station are you taking me to?”

The arresting Police Officer must immediately take you to the nearest Police station and no other place.

4.4 What to do when arrested

You have the right to make a telephone call.

Call your family or friend or lawyer or the Legal Aid Centre (LAC). Inform:

· you have been arrested;
· the time, place and reason of the arrest;
· the identity of the Police Officer; and
· the Police station you will be taken to.

4.5 What happens after arrest

You may be detained up to 24 hours:

· at the Police station, or
· in a lock-up to “assist” Police investigation.


5. YOUR RIGHTS AFTER ARREST & DURING DETENTION

5.1 Right to contact lawyer

You have the right and should insist to contact/see your lawyer.

5.2 Clothing

You are allowed to have one set of clothing on you in the lock-up.

5.3 Personal belongings

The Police must record and put all your personal belongings in safe custody.

Your personal belongings must be returned to you upon your release.

5.4 Welfare

You are allowed to take bath two times a day.

If you are sick, you have the right to receive immediate medical attention.

You are to be given proper and adequate food and water during detention.

5.5 How long can the Police detain you

The Police can only detain you up to 24 hours for investigation.

The duty of the Police is to complete investigation within 24 hours and to release you as soon as possible.

If the Police cannot complete investigation within 24 hours, the Police must bring you before a Magistrate for a remand order to extend your detention beyond 24 hours (“Remand Order”).


6. REMAND ORDER BY MAGISTRATE AFTER ARREST

6.1 Who is a Magistrate

A Magistrate is a judicial officer. He/She has power to make a Remand Order to detain you for more than 24 hours.

6.2 Purpose of a Remand Order

It is to give more time to the Police to complete their investigation and decide whether there is evidence to charge you for an offence.

The Police cannot ask for a Remand Order only for the purpose of taking a statement from you.

6.3 How long is a Remand Order

When the Police bring you before a Magistrate for a Remand Order, the Police must give reasons to the Magistrate why it is necessary to detain you beyond 24 hours. The Magistrate’s duty is to consider carefully the reasons given by the Police.

The Police will usually ask for a further detention of 14 days or less.

The Magistrate, after careful consideration of the reasons given by the Police, has discretion:

· not to make a Remand Order; or
· make a Remand Order for a period shorter than that asked by the Police.

The Police can make more than one application for a Remand Order. Altogether, you cannot be detained longer than 15 days.

6.4 What to say when you are brought before a Magistrate for remand

Tell the Magistrate:

· you want legal representation and to contact the LAC and your family;
· you want medical treatment because you are sick or have been beaten;
· if the Police had threatened or beaten you during your detention;
· if you had been denied proper food/water/clothing, toilet or necessary medical attention during your detention;
· whether the Police had carried out any investigation during your detention.

6.5 Ask for a shorter Remand Order from the Magistrate

Before the Magistrate makes the Remand Order, ask for a shorter remand period asked by the Police. Give reasons (Example: “I will co-operate with the Police in their investigation”, “I will be available” etc).


7. BODY SEARCH WITHOUT ARREST

7.1 When can this be done

If you are at a place (example: karaoke/clubs/entertainment outlets) where the Police are conducting a raid or looking for something (example: drugs), the Police may search your body/bags without arresting you.

This must be done in the presence of a Police Officer who is an inspector or of a higher rank.

7.2 What to do

· Do not allow the Police Officer to put his hands into your pockets or bags.
· Volunteer to empty your pockets/bags in his presence so you can see all your belongings.
· Take out your belongings one by one. Each time, say “Purse”, “keys”, “ID card”, etc.
· When your pockets/bags are empty, turn your pockets/bags inside out.

7.3 Your rights

· A female can only be body searched by a female Police Officer.
· All body searches must be carried out with decency (Example: cannot touch your private parts).
· There is no law requiring you to strip naked.


8. BODY SEARCH UPON ARREST

8.1 When Police can do so

· The Police have power to search your body for any object relating to the suspected offence.
· The body search must be conducted in a confined place. It is your right to be bodily searched in private.

8.2 Strip search

Even when arrested, there is no law allowing the Police to force you to strip naked.

If you are forced to strip naked/ threatened if you do not strip naked:

· Protest.
· Remember the Police Officer’s name.
· Lodge a report after the incident.


9. QUESTIONING BY POLICE AFTER ARREST

9.1 Identity of the Police Officer questioning you

Note the name/rank of the Police Officer questioning you.

9.2 Right to remain silent
The Police Officer will first make friendly conversation/talk (example: ask you about your family and friends etc). Be polite. Do not be afraid to remain silent. This is your right

9.3 Police want a written statement (113 Statement) from you

The Police Officer will ask you questions and then write down your answers. You are only obliged to give your full name, age, address and occupation (Personal Particulars).

Other than giving your Personal Particulars, you have the right to remain silent

If you choose the right to remain silent, say: "I will answer in Court".

9.4 Police cannot force you to make a 113 Statement

After giving your Personal Particulars and the Police Officer wants you to say more things by threatening or forcing you into making a written statement:

* Stay calm and remain silent;

*The Police Officer has no right to threaten, beat or force you into making a written statement.

If you have been threatened, beaten or forced, lodge a police report against the Police Officer at first opportunity. This is your right


9.5 If you wish to give 113 Statement

Follow the steps in paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 above.

If you do not have a notebook/writing paper, request from the Police Officer

Your 113 Statement can/will be used as evidence against you in Court to prove:

*you have admitted / confessed to the Criminal offence as charged; or

*you have admitted / confessed certain facts that tend to show you are guilty of the offence as charged.

Friday, November 16, 2007

RM27 million cop charged - call for end to “headless administration” and multi-millionaire cops

The charging of the Commercial Crime Investigation Department (CCID) director Datuk Ramli Yusuff in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court yesterday with two counts of failing to make a full disclosure of his assets and another for involvement in business which entail a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison if convicted has raised the curtain for public view of something very rotten both in the police force as well as the government.
It warrants an urgent call for an end to the “headless administration” presently prevalent in the country in the past four years, as it is most disheartening to the Malaysian public that despite the Royal Police Commission Report and its 125 recommendations to create an efficient, incorruptible, professional world-class police service to keep crime low, eradicate corruption and respect human rights, the rot both in the police and government have got worse rather than improve for the better.
The prosecution of the “RM27 million cop” reminds Malaysians of two serious allegations about corruption in the police force -
• The allegation by former top cop who was the country’s longest-serving Inspector-General of Police Tun Hanif Omar in August that 40% of senior police officers could be arrested for corruption without further investigations strictly on the basis of their lifestyles;
• The Royal Police Commission Report in May 2005 which found that “corruption is still widespread among police personnel” (p 9), recounting the case from a complainant of a senior police officer who made an asset declaration amounting to RM34 million but no action had been taken.
The Ramli prosecution has refocused public attention on the problem of police corruption and millionaire and multi-millionaire plice officers – and the failure to implement the recommendations of Royal Police Commission for zero tolerance for corruption in the police force.
A question that is being asked by Malaysians is whether Ramli would have been prosecuted by the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) if the CCID Director had not been caught in a fratricidal warfare with the Inspector-General of Police.
This leads to the second grave concern about the police force – with the police at war with itself as well as with the Internal Security Ministry, paralyzing a concentrated and an all-out war to keep crime low, the first of three major recommendations of the Royal Police Commission.
With the Police at war with itself for months on end, it is no surprise that crime in Malaysia has become as endemic as corruption in the country – failing to achieve the Royal Police Commission objective to safeguard the country’s reputation as a safe country for the sake of its citizens, tourists and foreign investors with the immediate target of “a minimum 20 per cent decrease in crimes” within the first 12 months after the Report.
This target has not been achieved as the opposite has taken place.
The Royal Police Commission has referred to the “alarming” and “dramatic increase” in the crime index from 121,176 cases in 1997 to 156,455 cases in 2004, which registered an increase of 29 per cent in eight years.
Instead of reducing the crime incidence of 156,455 cases in 2004 to a level “no longer alarming”, crime incidence is set to break the 200,000 mark this year – which would be a hefty increase of some 30% of the crime incidence of 2004!
With the crime index increasing by leaps and bounds, proving that crime and corruption have become even more endemic that during the inquiry of the Royal Police Commission, it is shocking and outrageous that the top police leadership is at war with itself with external agencies like the Attorney-General’s Chambers, the ACA and the Internal Security Ministry taking sides.
What is even more shocking is that the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi who is the Minister for Internal Security had allowed such fratricidal warfare to be waged in the Police Force for such a prolonged period, undermining all efforts to create a world-class professional police service to keep crime low, eradicate corruption and respect human rights.
This was why I was so angry when the Deputy Internal Security Minister, Datuk Fu Ah Kiow, trvialised the whole incident by giving a standard and meaningless reply about the internal police warfare, when he had earlier promised to give an informed, proper and satisfactory explanation to Parliament and the nation.
Parliament and the country are entitled to know what is happening in the Police force when its mission to keep crime low and root out corruption have been gravely undermined by the internal police warfare, with the Attorney-General’s Chamber, the ACA and the Internal Security Ministry taking sides and making the Royal Police Commission quite a wasted effort in terms of its three objectives – for the police to keep crime low, eradicate corruption and respect human rights.
For this reason, I urgently call for an end to a “headless administration” and establishment of a new Royal Commission of Inquiry into police corruption and police at war with itself with crime becoming as endemic as corruption in the country in the past two years.

Monday, November 12, 2007

Good leaders are always a good mentor......

Good leaders are always a good mentors and also can be a guide to an Positive attitudes, believes, honesty, friendly, understanding and leaderships.

Steven

Visitors from 1st December 2007